What's Hot

    M&G agrees two bulk purchase annuity deals totalling $760m

    21 September 2023

    ELSA Welcomes New Executive Board Members

    19 September 2023

    Editor’s Letter – Volume 2, Issue 9, September 2023

    15 September 2023
    Facebook Twitter Instagram
    Instagram LinkedIn Twitter
    Life Risk News
    • Home
    • Features

      Spotlight Falls on US Life Insurers’ Private Debt Investments

      14 September 2023

      The US Now The Last Remaining Traded Life Policy Market

      14 September 2023

      Re-Visiting the SEC Life Settlements Task Force More Than a Decade Later

      14 September 2023

      Generative AI Set to Transform Life Insurance Industry

      14 September 2023

      Q&A: David Blake, Professor of Finance & Director of Pensions Institute, Bayes Business School

      14 September 2023
    • Commentary

      The Critical Nature of Life Insurance Policy Due Diligence in the Life Settlement Asset Class

      14 September 2023

      Covid-19 Excess Mortality Analysis

      14 September 2023

      The Insurance Regulator Takes a Look at Funded Reinsurance

      10 August 2023

      Life Settlement Apocrypha

      10 August 2023

      UK Closed Life Funds – A Secret Returns Goldmine?

      12 July 2023
    • Events
    • Magazine
    • News

      M&G agrees two bulk purchase annuity deals totalling $760m

      21 September 2023

      ELSA Welcomes New Executive Board Members

      19 September 2023

      Prudential Financial and Warburg Pincus back new annuity reinsurer

      14 September 2023

      Ford UK pension scheme signs $450m partial buy-in deal

      14 September 2023

      European Life Settlement Association (ELSA) Hosts Successful Secondary Life Markets Conference 2023

      13 September 2023
    Subscribe
    Life Risk News
    Home»Commentary»LE Mortality Tables and Underwriting

    LE Mortality Tables and Underwriting

    Commentary 12 July 2023Traci DavisBy Traci Davis
    Twitter LinkedIn Email
    Share
    Twitter LinkedIn Email

    As long as there has been a life settlement market, there has been disagreement over the ‘best’ or appropriate mortality tables for determining life expectancy. The subject has been the source of countless white papers, articles, and verbal sparring during industry panel discussions between actuaries, underwriters, and researchers representing Life Expectancy Provider (LEP) firms. As an underwriting professional, I always come back to what I have always felt to be a relevant stance, which is: “You can have the best mortality table in the business, but if the risk assessment applied by the underwriter is incorrect, the output from the table is going to be worthless.”

    Historically, the relationship between actuarial and underwriting professionals has been symbiotic on the life insurance side. We develop our work in the same ecosystem, and both professions’ decisions will affect each other’s assumptions. However, it is critical to distinguish that actuarial philosophy is based on mathematical theory, based on large homogenous data populations. In contrast, the underwriting philosophy is based on health impairments with unique factors reflected at an individual applicant or insured level. So, when actuarial assumptions do not come to fruition, there is a deep dive into how the individualised risks, with shared components, were underwritten. These typically cause changes reflected in the mortality tables. Essentially, the underwriting process drives mortality table changes and outcomes.

    Consider the following: actuaries live in a world of large numbers. They typically relate it to ‘if we start with 1,000 lives’ when they break down examples. However, underwriters, while understanding that debit and credit methodology takes the law of large numbers into account, we live in a world of assessing the individual in front of us and all of the aspects of the risk that may be relative to the impairment but also unique to that individual. 

    For example, when you take the broad category of coronary artery disease, actuarial science (for developing appropriate outcomes relative to the risk) will start with the Framingham heart study out of MA (circa 1948). Framingham has been a serial decade study of individuals and their family members tracking specific cardiac risk factors over generations, starting with over 5,200 original participants. This study works well, from the diversity, population size, and duration (years of study time) for actuarial science, to determine, with reasonable certainty, the mortality impact of specific risk factors for developing disease and stability (or progression) of disease over time. This insight into crucial risk components is incorporated into underwriting manuals that guide the underwriter in capturing all relative risk factors the same way for every cardiac risk. However, the studies, the actuarial science, and the manual do not provide insight into the nuance of each risk. Meaning the data will indicate in broad terms a potential outcome. Still, the information underwriters develop on applicants or insureds is not purely broad-based impairment data; it is very specific to that individual.

    What does this intersection of actuarial science versus underwriting do? Suppose you are an underwriter that ‘underwrites by the book’ and applies what an underwriting manual suggests without considering the unique factors of the individual. In that case, there is a high probability that you will over or under-assess the risk (by applying too many or too few debits or credits). Then, when using that outcome in the actuarial table, which could be the most relevant table for the population of risk being assessed, the estimated life expectancy may be useless in pinpointing the risk.

    Based on life settlement-specific information noted in various articles, white papers, and presentations I ingest weekly, I have yet to see anything that focuses on the underwriting of the risk and how it impacts the mortality outcomes. Instead, most of the information is a continued argument over which table is best; Social security population being more relevant than insured lives tables, not sharing mortality tables because it is the ‘secret sauce’ of the process, layers of different tables to fit the risk, etc.

    While actuarial science is critical and has a place in developing appropriate tables based on the unique factors of the population being underwritten, underwriting is where the discussion should focus, even if you are working with a LEP that establishes all outcomes on the table. If you do not understand the underwriting methodology or philosophy, and you are not being provided that insight by the LEPs you are working with (assuming you are speaking with someone that is a professional and certified Actuary or a Certified Underwriting Professional), it is to be expected that the outcomes seen in the block of business you are managing will be not what you thought you’d see.

    Traci E. Davis, Certified FALU, FLMI, ACS is Chief Customer Whisperer, Chief Underwriter at Valkyrie Limited

    Volume 2 Issue 7 - July 2023
    Share. Twitter LinkedIn Email

    Related Posts

    The Critical Nature of Life Insurance Policy Due Diligence in the Life Settlement Asset Class

    14 September 2023

    Covid-19 Excess Mortality Analysis

    14 September 2023

    The Insurance Regulator Takes a Look at Funded Reinsurance

    10 August 2023

    Life Settlement Apocrypha

    10 August 2023

    Comments are closed.

    Most Popular

    Spotlight Falls on US Life Insurers’ Private Debt Investments

    14 September 2023

    The US Now The Last Remaining Traded Life Policy Market

    14 September 2023

    Re-Visiting the SEC Life Settlements Task Force More Than a Decade Later

    14 September 2023

    Generative AI Set to Transform Life Insurance Industry

    14 September 2023
    Ad

    Your trusted source for capital markets participation in Life Risk

    Twitter Instagram LinkedIn
    Life Risk
    • About Life Risk News
    • Get In Touch
    • Our Team
    • Copyright Notice
    • Privacy Policy
    • Sitemap
    Coverage
    • Home
    • Features
    • Events
    • Commentary
    Subscribe

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

    We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept All”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies. However, you may visit "Cookie Settings" to provide a controlled consent.
    Cookie SettingsAccept All
    Manage consent

    Privacy Overview

    This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
    Necessary
    Always Enabled
    Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. These cookies ensure basic functionalities and security features of the website, anonymously.
    CookieDurationDescription
    cookielawinfo-checkbox-analytics11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics".
    cookielawinfo-checkbox-functional11 monthsThe cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional".
    cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary".
    cookielawinfo-checkbox-others11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other.
    cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance".
    viewed_cookie_policy11 monthsThe cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data.
    Functional
    Functional cookies help to perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collect feedbacks, and other third-party features.
    Performance
    Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
    Analytics
    Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
    Advertisement
    Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with relevant ads and marketing campaigns. These cookies track visitors across websites and collect information to provide customized ads.
    Others
    Other uncategorized cookies are those that are being analyzed and have not been classified into a category as yet.
    SAVE & ACCEPT