Close Menu
    What's Hot

    Editor’s Letter – Volume 4, Issue 5, May 2025

    14 May 2025

    New Data Shows the Extent to Which American Seniors Are Missing Out by Lapsing or Surrendering their Life Insurance Policy

    14 May 2025

    Buy-Ins To Buy-Outs Appear Stalled As Deal Complexity, Administration Resources Pose Obstacles

    14 May 2025
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Instagram LinkedIn X (Twitter)
    Life Risk News
    • Home
    • Features

      New Data Shows the Extent to Which American Seniors Are Missing Out by Lapsing or Surrendering their Life Insurance Policy

      14 May 2025

      Buy-Ins To Buy-Outs Appear Stalled As Deal Complexity, Administration Resources Pose Obstacles

      14 May 2025

      Is Servicing an Overlooked Source of Life Settlement Alpha?

      14 May 2025

      Q&A: Shelly Beard, Managing Director, WTW

      14 May 2025

      Longevity Tech to Emerge as Distinct Sub-Sector of Venture Capital Market?

      14 May 2025
    • Commentary

      UK Life Insurers to Benefit from Robust Bulk Annuity Market in 2025

      14 May 2025

      The Power of Uncorrelated Diversification During Market Volatility

      14 May 2025

      Overseeing BPA Growth Safely

      14 May 2025

      Could Climate Change Cause the Buy-In Market To Collapse?

      10 April 2025

      ICS vs Solvency II: Comparing Risk Corrections for Illiquid Liabilities

      10 April 2025
    • Events
    • Magazine
    • News

      Life Insurance Settlement Association Publishes Latest Market Data Collection Survey Results

      13 May 2025

      UK Aggregate Defined Benefit Pension Fund Surplus Down Again in April

      12 May 2025

      Monument Re Transfers Greycastle Portfolio to RGA

      12 May 2025

      Cancer Research UK Pension Scheme Completes Bulk Purchase Annuity Buy-In With Standard Life

      12 May 2025

      AQA Education Completes Bulk Purchase Annuity Buy-In With Rothesay

      12 May 2025
    Subscribe
    Life Risk News
    Home » Life Risk News Litigation Bulletin: Rink

    Life Risk News Litigation Bulletin: Rink

    Commentary 8 June 2022ArentFox SchiffBy ArentFox Schiff
    Twitter LinkedIn Email
    Life settlements litigation
    Share
    Twitter LinkedIn Email

    Estate of Ann Rink, by its Executor, Michael Rink v. VICOF II Trust

    On May 17, 2022, a jury verdict rejected claims brought by an executor seeking the proceeds of a $1.5 million life insurance policy in the most recent development in so-called “estate cases” brought under Delaware law. 

    Phoenix Home Life issued the policy in 2006, and the insured used a premium finance loan from LaSalle Bank to pay the first two years of premiums. The initial owner of the policy was a Delaware trust, of which the insured’s husband was the beneficiary and her son co-trustee. In 2008, as the premium finance loan approached maturity, the insured attempted to sell the policy as a viatical settlement but was unable to obtain a bid for more than the outstanding balance of the loan. Rather than pay off the loan and retain control of the policy, the family chose to relinquish the policy to the lender in satisfaction of the loan. The subsequent owners of the policy then continued to pay the premiums necessary to keep the policy in force. After the insured died in 2018, Phoenix paid the resulting claim to the policy’s owner.

    The premium finance loan was administered and serviced by Coventry as part of the Premium Finance Plus (PFP) program that has been the subject of a flurry of litigation in recent years. Life insurance carriers have brought most cases involving the PFP program, and Sun Life has been particularly active in filing such suits. Cases by carriers have recently given way to cases brought by estates and their executors seeking to capitalize on Delaware’s “estate statute.” Estate cases brought under that statute are a recent phenomenon: the first such case, Estate of Phyllis Malkin v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., was filed in federal court in Florida in 2017, piggybacking off another decision in which Sun Life successfully argued that another policy on Ms. Malkin’s life was invalid.

    The instant case was filed in the federal district court for the Western District of North Carolina in March 2020, just four months after the court in Estate of Malkin entered judgment in favor of Ms. Malkin’s estate. The Complaint, filed by the insured’s eldest son Michael Rink as executor for his mother’s estate, alleged that the policy was a stranger-originated life insurance policy (STOLI) that the insured did not want and could not afford, and that the estate was entitled to its proceeds. Although the policy insured a North Carolina resident and the case was filed there, the suit claimed the policy was governed by Delaware law, and asserted a claim under a provision of Delaware’s insurable interest statute, Del. Stat. 2704(b), which permits insureds or their executors to seek disgorgement of the proceeds of life insurance policies that allegedly lack insurable interest. Prior to the trial, the Court determined that the case was governed by North Carolina law, but found that there was no conflict between Delaware and North Carolina law in that both states require life insurance policies to be supported at inception by a valid insurable interest, the requirements for which were substantially identical in both states.

    During the two-day trial, the jury heard testimony from two witnesses: the executor (the insured’s eldest son), and the life insurance agent that originated the policy. Both testified that the family took out the policy with the intention of selling it, and their testimony confirmed that the family not only participated in the application for (and relinquishment of) the policy but did so with a full understanding of what they were doing. Michael Rink is a CPA and financial planner, and the family sought legal advice on the loan documents.

    While a few cases brought by estates, including the Estate of Malkin case, have been decided on summary judgment, this was the first time such a claim has been presented to a jury. The eight-member jury was asked to answer a straightforward question: was the policy supported by an insurable interest? Its unanimous verdict was that it was, and it thereby rejected Mr. Rink’s claim that the policy was a wager on his mother’s life. The jury may have been influenced by the family’s undisputed, knowing involvement in the application for, and relinquishment of the policy.

    By ArentFox Schiff’s Insurance & Reinsurance Practice Group


    Any views expressed in this article are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of Life Risk News or its publisher, the European Life Settlement Association

    2022 - June Life Settlement Litigation Life Settlements Longevity Risk Secondary Life Markets Volume 1 Issue 2 - June 2022
    Share. Twitter LinkedIn Email

    Related Posts

    UK Life Insurers to Benefit from Robust Bulk Annuity Market in 2025

    14 May 2025

    The Power of Uncorrelated Diversification During Market Volatility

    14 May 2025

    Overseeing BPA Growth Safely

    14 May 2025

    Could Climate Change Cause the Buy-In Market To Collapse?

    10 April 2025

    Comments are closed.

    Most Popular

    New Data Shows the Extent to Which American Seniors Are Missing Out by Lapsing or Surrendering their Life Insurance Policy

    14 May 2025

    Buy-Ins To Buy-Outs Appear Stalled As Deal Complexity, Administration Resources Pose Obstacles

    14 May 2025

    Is Servicing an Overlooked Source of Life Settlement Alpha?

    14 May 2025

    UK Life Insurers to Benefit from Robust Bulk Annuity Market in 2025

    14 May 2025
    Ad

    Your trusted source for capital markets participation in Life Risk

    X (Twitter) Instagram LinkedIn
    Life Risk
    • About Life Risk News
    • Get In Touch
    • Our Team
    • Copyright Notice
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Sitemap
    Coverage
    • Home
    • Features
    • Events
    • Commentary
    Subscribe

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

    We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept All”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies. However, you may visit "Cookie Settings" to provide a controlled consent.
    Cookie SettingsAccept All
    Manage consent

    Privacy Overview

    This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
    Necessary
    Always Enabled
    Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. These cookies ensure basic functionalities and security features of the website, anonymously.
    CookieDurationDescription
    cookielawinfo-checkbox-analytics11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics".
    cookielawinfo-checkbox-functional11 monthsThe cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional".
    cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary".
    cookielawinfo-checkbox-others11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other.
    cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance".
    viewed_cookie_policy11 monthsThe cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data.
    Functional
    Functional cookies help to perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collect feedbacks, and other third-party features.
    Performance
    Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
    Analytics
    Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
    Advertisement
    Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with relevant ads and marketing campaigns. These cookies track visitors across websites and collect information to provide customized ads.
    Others
    Other uncategorized cookies are those that are being analyzed and have not been classified into a category as yet.
    SAVE & ACCEPT